README- Supplementary material

Viability of novae as sources of Galatic Li




#OMEGA+ kwargs for baseline MW model.
###mwop1### (based on 'OMEGA+ Milky Way Model with OMEGA+' notebook written by Benoit Cote):
### NO NOVA YIELDS ###
yieldtable = 'yield_tables/agb_and_massive_stars_K10_K06_0.5HNe.txt'
imf_yields_range = [1,30]
sfe=3.0e-10
mgal=1.0
m_DM_0=1.0e12
mass_loading=0.5

exp_infall = [[100/2.2, 0.0, 0.68e9], [13.0/2.2, 1.0e9, 7.0e9]]

kwargsplus1 = {"special_timesteps":200, "t_star":1.0, "table":yieldtable, "mgal":mgal,
          "m_DM_0":m_DM_0, "sfe":sfe, "mass_loading":mass_loading,
          "imf_yields_range":imf_yields_range,"exp_infall":exp_infall}

#call of omega+:
mwop1=omega_plus.omega_plus(**kwargsplus1)




Supplementary figures


callibration1:
This figure shows the bulk galactic properties of our model galaxy.


callibration2:
Galactic abundances of key elements used to validate our baseline model of the Milky Way, plotted with observational abundance data from NuPyCEE's STELLAB module
(https://github.com/NuGrid/NuPyCEE/blob/master/stellab_data/abundance_data_library.txt), where available. The bulk galactic properties and elemental abundances for most key elements are satisfactorily reproduced; notable exceptions such as K and Sc have been long established as problematic elements for contemporary stellar evolution and GCE codes (see, for example, kobayashi et al 2020).


MW_mass_R2017:
This figure illustrates the breakdown of the M_WD-Mdot prameterspace used for the R2017 yield profile. Each 'spot' represents a physical case simulated by Rukeya et al. 2017, with the grey lines demarcating the region of parameter space mapped to that specific simulation. The spots are coloured according to the amount of ejecta mass produced by that region of parameterspace by the time [Fe/H]=0 in in our model Galaxy.

